Prediction of Yuki Mochizuki [606th] vs Edan Leshem [899th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W L L
Form
L W W W L W L L L LHead To Head: Mochizuki 1 - 0 Leshem
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mochizuki winning 2 and Leshem winning 1. The last match between Mochizuki and Leshem was at the Busan Challenger, 07-05-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Yuki Mochizuki getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yuki Mochizuki | 1 |
| Edan Leshem | 0 |
| Mochizuki | Stats | Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (6-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 606 | Ranking | 899 |
| 471 | Highest Rank | 249 |
| 27 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 9 |
| 60% (176-116) | Career Total W/L | 58% (308-221) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $26,870 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Edan Leshem
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 11 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:18:2 | Average Match Time | 2:18:2 |
| 64% (70/109) | 1st Serve % | 55% (51/93) |
| 61% (43/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (20/51) |
| 49% (19/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 35% (7/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (4/18) |
| 53% (49/93) | Return Points Win % | 43% (47/109) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yuki Mochizuki vs Edan Leshem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 1 - 0 Leshem
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mochizuki has won 42.23% of points on their second serve, while Leshem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mochizuki, in recent form, has won 47.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leshem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.35% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mochizuki has saved 45.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leshem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mochizuki has won 51.11% of matches played (W/L 23/ 22), with Leshem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mochizuki has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 163), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Mochizuki has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 12/ 12), where as Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mochizuki winning 1 times and Leshem being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mochizuki winning 2 and Leshem winning 1. The last match between Mochizuki and Leshem was at the Busan Challenger, 07-05-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Yuki Mochizuki getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mochizuki and Leshem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mochizuki winning 1 times and Leshem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mochizuki winning 0, and Leshem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mochizuki has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.31 while Leshem has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mochizuki has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leshem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mochizuki has converted 42.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leshem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Yuki Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Breno Braga
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Conner Huertas Del Pino
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Ignacio Antonio Becerra Otarola
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Torrealba
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Nicolas Villalon
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vasco Leote Prata
Player
Edan Leshem
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Mochizuki vs Leshem?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Mochizuki Vs Leshem is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (176/116) | Win/Loss | 58% (308/221) |
| 59% (394/276) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (685/496) |
| 53% (3290/2904) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5851/5101) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 589 | Aces Total | 1533 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 478 | Total Double Faults | 1486 |
| 1:32:7 | Average Match Time | 1:20:52 |
| 236.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 213.72 |
| 69% (12587/18338) | 1st Serve % | 58% (16526/28702) |
| 63% (7966/12587) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11688/16526) |
| 51% (2934/5751) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6141/12176) |
| 46% (962/2095) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1328/3100) |
| 43% (8003/18512) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11947/29181) |
| 60% (170/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (299/503) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 11% (1/9) |
| 56% (44/79) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (59/122) |
| 48% (43/90) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (63/132) |
| 85% (169/144) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (322/275) |
| 14% (169/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (322/45) |
| 25% (122/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (206/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
